The same DOJ Indicted Comey but Not Me
How America's Justice System Became a Tool of Retaliation not Justice
Litigated at the Federal Court of Canada. A survivor of a legal case of persecution, torture, terrorism and transnational repression — extremely serious accusations the U.S. Congress, Department of Justice, and FBI , despite public pressure, could not challenge as false or criminalize as mandated by law under 18 U.S.C. §§ 1001 (false statements), §§ 371 (conspiracy) , §§ 1038 (false information about serious crimes) , §§ 1519 (falsification of records) , §§ 1621 (perjury) , §§ 35 (false information about attempted murder).
WASHINGTON, D.C. — On April 28, 2026, Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche stood beside our ass hole FBI Director Mr. Patel and announced the indictment of former FBI Director James Comey.
The charge? Arranging seashells on a beach to spell “86 47.”
The penalty? Up to 5 years in federal prison.
The message? The Department of Justice will prosecute anyone who threatens the President — even with seashells.
Now ask yourself this:
Why has the same Department of Justice, the same FBI, spent zero minutes investigating my accusations — not a single photograph, not a single tweet, but 2,000+ pages of documented and publicly shared evidence — serious accusations of persecution, torture, terrorism, and transnational repression, now pending before the Federal Court of Canada?
James Comey was indicted, I was not indicted
My message to our currently acting attorney general Mr. Blanch
THE PAPINI PRECEDENT: THEY INVESTIGATE LIES
Let me remind you what the FBI does when someone lies to them.
Sherri Papini claimed she was kidnapped by two Hispanic women. She was tortured. She was branded. She was held for weeks.
The truth? She was with her ex-boyfriend voluntarily. It was a hoax.
The FBI response? Five years of investigation. Massive resources. Public statements. Arrest. Prosecution. Conviction. 18 months in federal prison. $309,000 in restitution.
They spent 5 years investigating a lie.
They have spent 0 seconds investigating my 2,000+ pages of documented evidence.
THE COMEY PRECEDENT: THEY INDICT SEASHELLS
On April 28, 2026, the DOJ brought charges against James Comey — not for a crime, not for corruption, not for abuse of power.
For a photo of seashells.
The same DOJ, the same FBI, stood at a podium and announced they were prosecuting a former FBI Director for arranging shells on a beach.
They indicted seashells.
They have not indicted me for 2,000 pages of documented torture.
THE “UNCOMMON LAW” PODCAST: THE SYSTEM IS BROKEN
A recent Bloomberg Law podcast, “UnCommon Law,” by Matthew S. Schwartz. asked a simple question:
> “How does the Justice Department decide who gets charged and who doesn’t?”
The answer is chilling.
The Public Integrity Section — the office created after Watergate to ensure politically sensitive cases were handled fairly — has been dismantled. From 40 attorneys to just 2. Functionally eradicated.
Career prosecutors who recommended against charging Comey were overruled. The US Attorney who refused to bring the case resigned. A former personal lawyer for President Trump with no federal prosecution experience was installed to carry out the prosecution.
The safeguard is gone.
The question is not why you were charged, but why you were not charged, despite having provided evidence far exceeding what is required for an indictment?
What is mentioned in the PODCAST:
10:29
The prosecutor has the power to destroy people’s lives. The prosecutor has the power to actually kill people. The prosecutor decides what to charge, who to charge, how much to charge, and that power is dangerous when it’s in the hands of a vindictive prosecutor, a prosecutor who has no limitations, that feels that
Jump to 10:29
11:07
they can do anything they want to do, which is really what the justice department under Trump is today.
Selective prosecution is now the rule.
Selective prosecution is now the new rule in America. Americans should fear for their lives it could be destroyed or you will meet with Jesus or Muhammed in heaven express service.
But in a case like mine that will equate America to what my congress, our DOJ and FBI classify as authoritarian regimes is going to be prosecuting America not me.
So why am I not indicted yet? Under a DOJ that can be weaponized though the president said : it is about justice, if its about justice, I am not indicted.
MY CASE: SELECTIVE NON-PROSECUTION
I am not claiming I was targeted for prosecution. I am claiming the opposite.
The DOJ is engaging in selective non-prosecution — the power to never open a case.
If I am lying, I am committing multiple federal felonies, on top of them :
- 18 U.S.C. § 1001 — False statements to federal agents (up to 5 years per count)
- 18 U.S.C. § 371 — Conspiracy to defraud the United States (up to 5 years)
- 18 U.S.C. § 1038 — False information about serious crimes (up to 5 years)
- 18 U.S.C. § 35 — False information about attempted murder (up to 5 years)
- 18 U.S.C. § 1519 — Falsification of records (up to 20 years)
If I am lying, I am the easiest prosecution in the DOJ and FBI history.
They have not indicted me.
They have not arrested me.
They have not charged me.
Are they afraid to responded to me?
The "UnCommon Law" podcast explores the doctrine of selective prosecution—when someone is targeted for prosecution for improper reasons. My case presents the mirror image: selective non-prosecution. The DOJ is choosing not to investigate me, not because my evidence is insufficient, but because investigating would expose the CIA's torture operations and the FBI's complicity. This is the same political interference that dismantled the Public Integrity Section, but applied to silence a witness who could have saved thousands of American lives.
THE UNANSWERABLE QUESTION
I have publicly:
- Accused the CIA of torture and attempted murder
- Named the FBI Director personally
- Insulted him publicly
- Offered a $50 billion deal contingent on prosecution if my claims are false
- Filed 2,000+ pages of evidence with Canadian courts, the UN, and the IACHR
- Documented a 10-year pattern across 7 countries
- Provided medical records, police reports, forensic analysis, AI analysis, and sworn affidavits
If I am lying, why am I not in indicted?
If I am delusional, why have they not committed me?
If I am a threat, why have they not stopped me?
If I am telling the truth, why are they silent?
THE ONLY CONCLUSION
There is only one logical answer.
They know I am telling the truth.
If I were lying, they would have arrested me. They would have prosecuted me. They would have used me as an example, just as they used Sherri Papini.
They have not.
Because investigating me would not lead to my arrest.
It would lead to the exposure of the CIA’s 10-year campaign of extraction, torture, and transnational repression.
It would lead to the exposure of the FBI’s complicity.
It would lead to the exposure of allied governments’ obedience.
Their silence is not a lack of resources. It is not a lack of mandate.
It is a deliberate choice to protect power over pursuing truth.
TO THE DOJ AND THE FBI
You indicted a former FBI Director for seashells.
You investigated a hoax for 5 years.
You have done nothing about my 2,000+ pages of documented evidence.
You cannot claim ignorance. You cannot claim lack of resources. You cannot claim lack of mandate.
You have chosen silence.
And your silence is the loudest confession of all.
TO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE
The DOJ is supposed NOT to be blind. It is.
The FBI is supposed to investigate crimes. It protects them.
The system is broken. And I am the living evidence.
If they can ignore an attempt at murder, they can ignore anything.
If they can protect the CIA, they can protect anyone else.
And if they can torture me, they can torture you.
My public invitation to be indicted:
The CIA extracted me because they hate me, so if John - current CIA director - hate me , he shouldn’t be scared of me or helping them prosecute me. make sense?
This is not a conspiracy theory. This is a documented legal case the FBI did not arrest me for it.
Why The FBI Did Not Arrest ME ?
A currently active case at the Federal Court of Canada and Canadian IRCC. A case of persecution, torture, terrorism, and transnational repression by the US Government, by the CIA aided by the FBI. 10 years, 7 countries and 16 escape trips. A case filed in
The evidence is public. The case is real. And I am fearing for my life.
J a c e
Comments
Post a Comment